Nomic 2/Proposals/The Standing Rule - Revision history

Jota at 02:07, 28 February 2012

2012-02-28T02:07:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 27 February 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Roger: Nay; this gives me an uneasy feeling in the pit of my bowels.		* Roger: Nay; this gives me an uneasy feeling in the pit of my bowels.
	* vimes: Nay. Players get in without rules, and we don't have a spam problem.		* vimes: Nay. Players get in without rules, and we don't have a spam problem.
			* ''All players effectively vote against this proposal due to its being declared dead.''

			== Proposal Status ==

			I hereby declare this proposal dead, as Baf, Roger, vimes and I are against it. --[[User:Jota\|Jota]] 18:07, 27 February 2012 (PST)

2012-02-07T00:37:26Z

Proposed by

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 6 February 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* Baf: Nay. Like Jota, I don't think we should be using rule proposals to add players, but in addition, I don't see a need for the rest of the rule either. Why not let non-players propose rules? If we don't like what they propose, we can just vote it down. I don't think there's much danger of us getting inundated with so many outside proposals that it becomes a problem.		* Baf: Nay. Like Jota, I don't think we should be using rule proposals to add players, but in addition, I don't see a need for the rest of the rule either. Why not let non-players propose rules? If we don't like what they propose, we can just vote it down. I don't think there's much danger of us getting inundated with so many outside proposals that it becomes a problem.
	* Roger: Nay; this gives me an uneasy feeling in the pit of my bowels.		* Roger: Nay; this gives me an uneasy feeling in the pit of my bowels.
			* vimes: Nay. Players get in without rules, and we don't have a spam problem.

2012-02-06T18:52:32Z

Roger wants proposals, wink wink.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 6 February 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* Jota: Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them		* Jota: Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them
	* Baf: Nay. Like Jota, I don't think we should be using rule proposals to add players, but in addition, I don't see a need for the rest of the rule either. Why not let non-players propose rules? If we don't like what they propose, we can just vote it down. I don't think there's much danger of us getting inundated with so many outside proposals that it becomes a problem.		* Baf: Nay. Like Jota, I don't think we should be using rule proposals to add players, but in addition, I don't see a need for the rest of the rule either. Why not let non-players propose rules? If we don't like what they propose, we can just vote it down. I don't think there's much danger of us getting inundated with so many outside proposals that it becomes a problem.
			* Roger: Nay; this gives me an uneasy feeling in the pit of my bowels.

2012-01-23T20:27:13Z

Proposed by

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 23 January 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* Matthew: Yes		* Matthew: Yes
	* Jota: Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them		* Jota: Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them
			* Baf: Nay. Like Jota, I don't think we should be using rule proposals to add players, but in addition, I don't see a need for the rest of the rule either. Why not let non-players propose rules? If we don't like what they propose, we can just vote it down. I don't think there's much danger of us getting inundated with so many outside proposals that it becomes a problem.

2012-01-23T14:58:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 23 January 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	* Matthew: Yes		* Matthew: Yes
	* Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them		* Jota: Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them

2012-01-23T14:58:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 23 January 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	* Matthew: Yes		* Matthew: Yes
			* Nay, but only for technical reasons: I'd prefer to use the Revolving Door rule to add players rather than adding them in separate, individual rules, and I'd like to have a firm definition of what a Proposal is (e.g. "What the Heck...") before making the rule that only players can make them

2012-01-23T14:30:18Z

2012-01-20T20:24:12Z

Created page with "== Proposal == Only players can propose rules. Fang is a player. == Proposed by == ~~~~"

New page

== Proposal ==

Only players can propose rules. Fang is a player.

== Proposed by ==

[[User:Fang|Fang]] 12:24, 20 January 2012 (PST)