Difference between revisions of "Nomic 2/Proposals/Clarity Rule"
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Votes== | ==Votes== | ||
* maga: Aye | * maga: Aye | ||
* Jota: Aye | |||
* vimes: Aye | |||
* Matthew: Yes | |||
* Baf: Aye | |||
* Doug: Yes | |||
== Proposal Status == | |||
Passed as of http://inky.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nomic_2/Proposals/Clarity_Rule&curid=211&diff=3159&oldid=3150&rcid=3227 | |||
Latest revision as of 18:54, 26 January 2012
Proposal
This proposal enacts a new rule (called the Clarity Rule).
1) A proposal can only alter the meaning of a pre-existing rule (by superseding or repealing parts or all of it, modifying its text, or establishing an authoritative interpretation) if it explicitly mentions that pre-existing rule.
2) If a reference is not made in this way, conflicts between rules shall be resolved, by default, in favour of the older (lower-numbered) rule.
3) If a proposal mentioning existing rules is agreed upon and ratified, references to it will be appended to all rules that it mentions. Any player may perform this action.
Proposed By
Maga 16:32, 20 January 2012 (PST)
Votes
- maga: Aye
- Jota: Aye
- vimes: Aye
- Matthew: Yes
- Baf: Aye
- Doug: Yes
Proposal Status
Passed as of http://inky.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nomic_2/Proposals/Clarity_Rule&curid=211&diff=3159&oldid=3150&rcid=3227
