Difference between revisions of "Nomic 2/Proposals/The Supermajority Rule"

From RPG Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Proposed by==
==Proposed by==
--[[User:Fang|Fang]] 12:30, 20 January 2012 (PST)
--[[User:Fang|Fang]] 12:30, 20 January 2012 (PST)
==Comments==
My vote in favor of this is under the provision that A) everyone who voted in favor of this before me (I think just baf) confirms explicitly that they accept this as a valid thing to be voted on, and B) everyone who votes on it after me does not explicitly disavow this as a valid thing to be voted on. In the absence of these two provisions, my vote reverts to a Nay. --[[User:Jota|Jota]] 16:53, 28 January 2012 (PST)
* [nomic]|16:06 Jota asks, "So your vote in favor of it stands?"
* [nomic]|16:07 baf says, "Oh, I definitely vote in its favor regardless."
* [nomic]|16:07 Jota exclaims, "Which means I've voted in favor of it as well, which means it's passed!"


==Votes==
==Votes==


Baf: Aye. The last game never ditched unanimity. I suspect there will be more drama to the game this way.
* Baf: Aye. The last game never ditched unanimity. I suspect there will be more drama to the game this way.
* Jota: Aye, with the provisions mentioned above under "Comments"
* Fang: Aye
* olethros: Aye
* maga: Aye
* vimes: Aye, why the heck not.
* Doug: Yes, and may God have mercy on our souls.
 
==Proposal Status==
 
Passed as of the ifMUD conversation cited in http://inky.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nomic_2/Proposals/The_Supermajority_Rule&oldid=3224

Latest revision as of 19:01, 31 January 2012

Proposal

Modifies rule 7: Rules can be changed by a supermajority of two thirds or more of the players.

Proposed by

--Fang 12:30, 20 January 2012 (PST)

Comments

My vote in favor of this is under the provision that A) everyone who voted in favor of this before me (I think just baf) confirms explicitly that they accept this as a valid thing to be voted on, and B) everyone who votes on it after me does not explicitly disavow this as a valid thing to be voted on. In the absence of these two provisions, my vote reverts to a Nay. --Jota 16:53, 28 January 2012 (PST)

  • [nomic]|16:06 Jota asks, "So your vote in favor of it stands?"
  • [nomic]|16:07 baf says, "Oh, I definitely vote in its favor regardless."
  • [nomic]|16:07 Jota exclaims, "Which means I've voted in favor of it as well, which means it's passed!"


Votes

  • Baf: Aye. The last game never ditched unanimity. I suspect there will be more drama to the game this way.
  • Jota: Aye, with the provisions mentioned above under "Comments"
  • Fang: Aye
  • olethros: Aye
  • maga: Aye
  • vimes: Aye, why the heck not.
  • Doug: Yes, and may God have mercy on our souls.

Proposal Status

Passed as of the ifMUD conversation cited in http://inky.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nomic_2/Proposals/The_Supermajority_Rule&oldid=3224

Retrieved from "https://inky.org/wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Nomic_2/Proposals/The_Supermajority_Rule&oldid=3236"