Difference between revisions of "Nomic 2/Proposals/The Supermajority Rule"
From RPG Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Votes) |
(→Votes: Yes) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* maga: Aye | * maga: Aye | ||
* vimes: Aye, why the heck not. | * vimes: Aye, why the heck not. | ||
* Doug: Yes, and may God have mercy on our souls. |
Revision as of 14:36, 31 January 2012
Proposal
Modifies rule 7: Rules can be changed by a supermajority of two thirds or more of the players.
Proposed by
--Fang 12:30, 20 January 2012 (PST)
Comments
My vote in favor of this is under the provision that A) everyone who voted in favor of this before me (I think just baf) confirms explicitly that they accept this as a valid thing to be voted on, and B) everyone who votes on it after me does not explicitly disavow this as a valid thing to be voted on. In the absence of these two provisions, my vote reverts to a Nay. --Jota 16:53, 28 January 2012 (PST)
Votes
- Baf: Aye. The last game never ditched unanimity. I suspect there will be more drama to the game this way.
- Jota: Aye, with the provisions mentioned above under "Comments"
- Fang: Aye
- olethros: Aye
- maga: Aye
- vimes: Aye, why the heck not.
- Doug: Yes, and may God have mercy on our souls.