Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nomic 2/Proposals/Voting Brevity"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A reasonable concern, which I hope to address with [[Nomic 2/Proposals/What The Heck Is A Proposal Anyway]] --[[User:Vimes|Vimes]] 12:19, 20 January 2012 (PST) | A reasonable concern, which I hope to address with [[Nomic 2/Proposals/What The Heck Is A Proposal Anyway]] --[[User:Vimes|Vimes]] 12:19, 20 January 2012 (PST) | ||
I think that a modification such that at least 1/3rd of folks vote positively for a rule should be included, at least. | |||
That way we won't have a situation where a lot of people may not see a proposal due to being coincidentally away for some time. --[[User:Olethros|Olethros]] 05:24, 30 January 2012 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:24, 30 January 2012
Should this be interpreted as a new rule? --Jota 11:44, 20 January 2012 (PST)
It occurs to me that without a formal process for making proposals or a formal definition of what a proposal is, this could lead to ambiguous situations. If I email a new rule idea to myself without showing it to anyone, is it a proposal? Does it become law in three days? --Jota 11:57, 20 January 2012 (PST)
A reasonable concern, which I hope to address with Nomic 2/Proposals/What The Heck Is A Proposal Anyway --Vimes 12:19, 20 January 2012 (PST)
I think that a modification such that at least 1/3rd of folks vote positively for a rule should be included, at least. That way we won't have a situation where a lot of people may not see a proposal due to being coincidentally away for some time. --Olethros 05:24, 30 January 2012 (PST)
