Difference between revisions of "Nomic 2/Proposals/Pruning the Garden"

From RPG Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
I originally included the "(not counting time elapsed before the adoption of this rule)" bit because I didn't want proposals to become having already been retroactively dead as soon as this passed, but if a player has to actively declare a proposal dead, I guess it's unnecessary. --[[User:Jota|Jota]] 13:47, 27 January 2012 (PST)
I originally included the "(not counting time elapsed before the adoption of this rule)" bit because I didn't want proposals to become having already been retroactively dead as soon as this passed, but if a player has to actively declare a proposal dead, I guess it's unnecessary. --[[User:Jota|Jota]] 13:47, 27 January 2012 (PST)


Seems like this is kind of in conflict with the Supremajority rule, under which having a player in disapproval of a rule for four days straight isn't really an obstacle to passing it.
Seems like this is kind of in conflict with the Supremajority rule, under which having a player in disapproval of a rule for four days straight isn't really an obstacle to passing it. [[User:Baf|Baf]] 17:59, 31 January 2012 (PST)


== Voting ==
== Voting ==

Revision as of 20:59, 31 January 2012

Proposal

New Rule:

If a player has been in disapproval of a proposal continuously for four days straight, any player may declare that proposal "dead" by editing its wiki page to indicate this status under a "Proposal Status" heading on the proposal's wiki page.

  • At the moment a proposal becomes dead, all players are considered to immediately vote against it (regardless of how they may have previously voted regarding the proposal).
  • Any new players added to the game are considered to immediately vote against all dead proposals.
  • If, by any means, a player votes in favor of a dead proposal, that player is considered to immediately change their vote to be against it.
  • If a proposal is dead, no player is permitted to edit its wiki page in such a way that would make it appear not to be dead.

Proposed by

Jota 16:17, 26 January 2012 (PST)

Comments

I originally included the "(not counting time elapsed before the adoption of this rule)" bit because I didn't want proposals to become having already been retroactively dead as soon as this passed, but if a player has to actively declare a proposal dead, I guess it's unnecessary. --Jota 13:47, 27 January 2012 (PST)

Seems like this is kind of in conflict with the Supremajority rule, under which having a player in disapproval of a rule for four days straight isn't really an obstacle to passing it. Baf 17:59, 31 January 2012 (PST)

Voting

  • Jota: Aye

Proposal Status

Open for voting.